Help Me Write My Wedding Vows

Write My Wedding Vows for Me Congratulations! Soon you will pledge a commitment to the most special person in your life. The uttered words will reverberate around the room, bounce against the crystal chandeliers, and enter two flaming hearts transforming them forever. Your wedding vows are powerful spells making everyone around a bit (or a lot) giddy. They should be perfect. Otherwise, they will wink out of existence without the slightest trace. Guests won’t grab for tissues; your partner won’t experience a giant dose of joy delivered straight into her or his heart. Crafting the words of a binding commitment is a consequential and complicated task. No wonder then, that people on the cusp of a wedding realize a terrible thing: â€Å"I can’t write my wedding vows.† If you also wonder â€Å"how should I write my vows,† we’ve got great news: we can write them for you. Our talented writers are here to help you declare your love and commitment to your partner. They can make your wedding vows poetic; they can add a faith-based angle; they can give them a traditional or a modern polish. Chat with our writers, and they will help you organize your bliss and express your feelings in a candid and memorable way. Order professionally-written wedding vows to make your special day even more special. GET WEDDING VOWS NOW! Should I Write My Own Vows? â€Å"Do I have to write my own vows?† you wonder. Well, it depends. If you can easily find the words to describe feelings, emotions, and moments you and your partner have shared together and know how to profess your love to them in a simple and memorable way, then, sure, go ahead. Professional writers and journalists also don’t need our assistance. They can wield their words with elegance and ease. If, however, you haven’t been blessed with the gift of eloquence, you might ruin the whole ceremony if you try to write the high-stakes speech on your own. A poorly-written vow can become a blot blemishing the otherwise perfect day. Do you want your wedding vow to be a blot or a blast? Here’s how to decide whether you need writing assistance. Concentrate on this thought: â€Å"I have to write my own wedding vows.† Does it calm you or give you chills? If shivers start zigzagging down your spine, you should consider getting our help. Reasons Not to Write My Own Vows Your wedding is around the corner. Does it mean that you should start baking a wedding cake and learn how to use a fancy DSLR camera? Unless you’ve been marooned on a desert island with a person of your dreams, you shouldn’t. Planning a wedding ceremony is important, which is why brides and grooms often do it on their own. But doing everything on your own is way too much. So, when it comes to the speech, and you wonder Can I write my own vows in a Catholic wedding?, youd better think again. Couples pick the processional music and let professional musicians play it. They don’t approach the marriage officiant with violins in their hands. In the same vein, it is absolutely normal to ask someone â€Å"Please, help write my wedding vows† and read it yourself. You shouldn’t write the vows on your own if: You aren’t sure that the words will flow together in a pleasing and candid way; You don’t want to blush while watching a wedding video later; You don’t want to mar the perfect day. Don’t play roulette with the most important day of your life. Let us help you craft perfect personally-worded wedding vows! GET BEAUTIFUL VOWS Reasons to Ask Us â€Å"Write My Vows for Me† With all the pressure and confusion of wedding preparation, it is difficult to find your bearings speaking nothing of writing vows of everlasting commitment. Pre-wedding buzz is a fog in which beautiful thoughts and words are getting lost. But you need those beautiful words. You need them now more than ever. It is precisely for this reason that you should find someone to help you out. By asking us â€Å"write my wedding vows,† you give yourself some breathing room. You give yourself a chance to express your feelings as accurately as possible. Don’t neglect this chance. Once you realize â€Å"I don’t want to write my own vows,† place an order here. Our experienced writers will craft you breath-taking words of love everyone will remember forever. Here’s why you should ask us â€Å"Write my vows†: 10 Years of Experience We have been helping couples to find the right words for more than ten years. Having amassed requisite expertise, we are well-equipped to help you express your commitment and love. 3-Hour Delivery If your wedding day is approaching fast and you cannot afford to wait, there is no better way to get perfect vows than to order them here. Your vows can be written in only 3 hours! Affordable Prices You won’t have to break the bank to get professional writing help. Our prices are quite reasonable, and there are no hidden costs. You will be pleasantly surprised to discover how little you will have to pay for beautiful vows. Free Revisions You can ask us to revise your wedding vows up to three times absolutely for free. Together, we will make them perfect. Anonymity Guarantee No one has to know about the authorship of the high-stakes speech. Money-Back Guarantee We want nothing more than your complete satisfaction with our service. Therefore, we are willing to give your money back if it falls short of your expectations. Order custom wedding vows in less than 5 minutes! GET CUSTOM WEDDING VOWS I Can’t Write My Vows: What Should I Do? If your attempts to use time-worn write my own wedding vows examples on the Web have not been crowned with success, use our help. Mesmerizing wedding vows can be ordered in three simple steps: Fill out an order form at the top of your screen. Pay for the vows using the secure payment processor of your choice. Download custom vows on your computer. We will write your wedding vows with care and consideration. You will read them with passion and dedication. GET WEDDING VOWS NOW!

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection And Acquired Immune...

Pathogenic Agent Identified Human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) Virus after the infection of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the immune system is damaged so the body become targets of many opportunistic diseases, which called syndrome, rather than just a type of disease. [1] History of Pathogenic Agent The clinical of AIDS was first observed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1981. [2] The region most recent outbreak is In 2005, Sub-Saharan Africa. An estimated 22.9 million of HIV cases and 1.2 million of all deaths occurred in this region. [3] Figure 1-The estimated number of AIDS patients countries Stages and Symptoms of the Disease: There is three†¦show more content†¦Some people stay in this state, while another part of the patient will develop severe AIDS. [4] Anatomy of the Pathogen: The size of an HIV virus particle is about 0.1 micrometre, it has a circular shape Figure2-structure of HIV. [5] The viral envelope, the outer coating of the virus, comprising two layers of lipids. HIV matrix proteins, is Between the envelope and core. Viral core contains the viral envelope protein p24 of HIV RNA surrounded by two single-stranded, for HIV replication enzymes. [5] Figure 3-Scanning electron micrograph of HIV-1 Physiology of the Pathogen: The virus spread from person to person, but only by a few means to spread. The most common are: the exchange of body fluids during sexual intercourse and sharing used needles. [6] Once the HIV virus enters a new host, aims to infect target cells and hijacking. The most widely recognized of these target cells are the T cells, which are most relevant of the immune system. When HIV-infected T cells, it will not kill it. On the contrary, it is parasitic in the cells, using it to produce more HIV. [6] Both HIV-1 and HIV-2 is considered to be derived from the West, Central Africa

Professional Research Alchemist Inc Free Essays

Specifically, it says that the existence dad et of the termination plan (I. E. The communication date) occurs when the following critic aria have been met and communicated to employees: (1) management have committed to the term nomination plan, (2) the plan identifies which employees will be terminated and the expected com lotion date, (3) the plan establishes the benefits arrangement in sufficient detail, and (4) it is unlike Ely that the plan will be withdrawn. We will write a custom essay sample on Professional Research Alchemist Inc or any similar topic only for you Order Now In this case, termination plans exist for Plant A and B noon management employees on August 15, 2004 because on this date, each termination plan (1 ) has been approved by the board, (2) identifies the employees to be terminated, (3) identifies the b infinite paid per employee, and (4) is unlikely to change. In other words, August 1 5, 2004 is the communication date for the management termination plans for both Plant A and Plant B. FAST ASS 42010258 then indicates that if employees will not be retained to r ender service beyond the minimum retention period (I. E. The legal notification period d), then a liability for the termination benefits shall be recognized at the communication date. I n accordance with 42010305, this liability should be measured at its fair value at the communicate ion date. Thus, the termination benefits for Plant A management employees, who will not be retained past the day notification period, should be recorded as a liability on August 15, 2 004, measured at the fair value of the benefits as of August 15 Using the example from FAST ASS 42010553, We find that we can multiply the $5,000 per employee by the number Of term anted employees who are expected to remain at the termination date in order to estimate fair v alee. The expected transaction could be as follows: Termination Benefit Loss Termination Benefit Liability FAST ASS 42010259 States that if employees are required to provide service u until they are terminated in order to receive termination benefits and will be retain De to provide service beyond the minimum retention period, then a liability for the terminate ion benefits should e measured at the communication date. According to FAST ASS 42010306, t his liability should be measured based on the fair value of the liability as of the terminate on date and should be recognized ratable over the future service period. This applies to the term nation plan at Plant B, where management desires to retain the management employees past the day notification period. Thus, Alchemist should measure a liability for the Plant B management termination benefits on August 15, 2004 and this liability will be measured at TTS fair value as of December 30, 2004 (the termination date). Using the example in FAST ASS 42010555, we find that the fair value of the liability for the termination plan at Plant B can b e found by using an expected present value technique. Furthermore, the liability should be recognized ratable by Alchemist in each month during the future service period (the daddy period ended 12/30/2004). Now that we have addressed the termination benefits to management e employees, we need to address the severance benefits to management employees at Plant A and B. For the severance benefits paid to management, FAST ASS 71210052 indicates that the benefits fall under the â€Å"contractual termination benefits† literature because the benefits a re required if a specified event, such as a plant closing, causes employees to be involuntarily t ruminated. FAST ASS 71210252 then indicates that an employer who provides contractual term nomination benefits should recognize a liability and a loss when it is probable that employees will be entitled to benefits and the amount can be reasonably estimated. In this case, It is probe blew that the liability has been incurred on August 15, 2004 because the termination Of the plant m management is almost retain and the board has stated that the severance benefits will be provided. In addition, the loss can be reasonably estimated because the benefits are outlined by the employ e benefit website. Thus, Alchemist should recognize a loss and a liability for the management Severna CE benefits on August 15, 2004. In accordance with FAST ASS 71210252, the liability and loss shall include the amount of any lumps payments and the present value of any e expected future payments. The general transaction is shown below: Severance Benefit Loss Severance Benefit Liability Early Termination of the Lease We were then asked to address the appropriate accounting treatment for the early termination of the lease. FAST ASS 42010251 1 indicates that costs to terminate e an operating lease can include costs that will continue to be incurred under the lease control act when there is no economic benefit to the entity of the lease. This applies in the case of Alchemy SST, who is terminating the use of the plant, but is unable to cancel the operating lease. F CAB ASS 42010308 then states that a liability for these incalculable operating lease co SST should be recognized at the causes date. Furthermore, FAST ASS 42010308 and 4201 309 indicate that the fair value of the liability at the causes date should be deter mined based on the remaining lease rental payments, adjusted for any prepaid or deferred items, and reduced by estimated sublease rental payments that could be reasonably obtained (whet her or not the entity enters the sublease). For Alchemist, the causes date is December 30, 2004. Thus, on December 30, 2004, Alchemist would recognize a liability equal to the fair value e of the remaining lease payments ($4 million per year) reduced by the estimated subs ease payments ($1 million per year) as of December 30th. The transaction would be as follows: Rental Expense Rental Liability Other Costs (Plant Security Cost) Lastly, we were asked to address the appropriate accounting treatment for the e security costs associated with protecting plant B premises. FAST ASS 420102514 and 4 20102515 give us a guideline for the recognition of other costs (e. G. Plant security costs) associated with an exit or disposal activity. Since Alchemist anticipates hiring plant securities fate r plant Bi’s termination, the estimation of the cost is regarded as a liability and should be recognized in the period when the guarding service is received. In addition, FAST ASS 4201030 10 indicates that such liability shall be measured at its fair value in the period it is incurred . That is, Alchemist should recognized the incremental cost of $1 after December ere 30, 2014 when the plant B is closed. Disclosure As stated in FAST ASS 42010501, all events related to exit or disposal activities shall be disclosed in notes to financial statements. Therefore, the amount expected to be incurred in connection with employee termination benefits, contract termination costs, a ND other associated costs should be disclosed accordingly. To be more specific, the total amount e expected to be incurred, the amount incurred in this period, and the cumulative amount incur red to date associated with contractual termination benefits, the operating lease costs, as well as the plan t securities cost, should be disclosed in notes to financial statements. Literature Appendix: Employee Termination Literature 420 Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations 10 overall General 42010051 The Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic addresses financial accounting an reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. An exit activity in eludes but is not limited to a restructuring 42010052 Those costs include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Involuntary employee termination benefits pursuant to a onetime benefit arrangement that, in substance, is not an ongoing benefit arrangement or an individual deferred compensation contract b. Costs to terminate a contract that is not a capital lease c. Other associated costs, including costs to consolidate or close facilities and relocate employees. Transactions 42010153 The guidance in the Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations Topic applies to the following transactions and activities: a. Termination benefits provided to current employees that are involuntarily terminated under the terms of a benefit arrangement that, in substance, is not an ongoing been fit arrangement or an individual deferred compensation contract (referred to as onetime employee termination benefits b. Costs to terminate a contract that is not a capital lease (see paragraphs 420102511 through 251 3 for further description of contract termination costs and paragraph 84030401 for terminations of a capital lease) c. Costs to consolidate facilities or relocate employees d. Costs associated with a disposal activity covered by Subtopic 20520 . Costs associated with an exit activity, including exit activities associated wit h an entity newly acquired in a business combination or an acquisition by a interoffice entity OneTime Employee Termination Benefits 42010254 An arrangement for onetime employee termination benefits exists at the date the plan of termination meets all Of the following criteria and has been com enunciated to employees (referred to as the communication date a. Management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan n of termination. How to cite Professional Research Alchemist Inc, Essays

Contributory Negligence Samples for Students †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Contributory Negligence. Answer: The issue at hand in this case that has been presented is that of negligence. In this case, Ruth claims that she was injured after of what is as a result of work that had been undertaken by Keith. Keith had purported that he was a qualified carpenter prompting Ruth to believe in his work. It is important to understand that a professional carpenter must be able to know that a rotting timber tread may be dangerous and that the same must be replaced by treated timber. As a result of the actions of Keith it can be recorded that Ruth suffered injuries and lost her job which resulted into increased injuries. It is essential to understand that in order for one to file for a negligencelaw suit their must be damages as it is in the case of the Ruth. By reference to the facts that have been provided, Ruth can file for contributory negligence in order to ensure that he is awarded partial damages as a result of the injuries he suffered. It is essential to understand that in contributory negligence there is no single party that is blamed for an injury caused but rather the blame is distributed equally among all the parties that were part of the actions that resulted to the injury (Robinette Sherland, 2003). In this case, Ruth can absorb Keith from all the blame of the injuries that were as a result of his poor work and request to have the blame distributed equally on both parties. However, there are a number of elements that Ruth must be able to satisfy in order to effectively put up a case. It must be understood that the burden of proof in this case lies entirely on the Plaintiff and they must convince the court without any reasonable doubt that the actions of the defendant contributed to the injury that occurred to them. First, it is essential to understand that in a contributory case, the plaintiff does not entirely place the blame on the defendant but rather on their part also (Rowe, 2009). Ruth should be able to explain to the court that her failure to inspect the work and take care of herself while walking on the tread had resulted to her injuries. This will have the court understand that she is sincere in her quest and that she is not out there just trying to take advantage of her circumstances to fleece Keith of his money. The case of Davies V Swan Motor co. is one of the cases that contributory negligence has been blamed partly on the plaintiff (Dange es, Occupiers). In the case the plaintiff had caused their injury by dangerously standing on a moving lorry. Although the lorry driver was partly to blame for driving while there was a person dangerously hanging from it was important that they considered the same would cause harm to the person. Proof of negligence is also a very important factor that should be considered in order to try and convince the court to award damages. The proof of negligence also requires to be proven by taking into consideration a number of aspects (McDonald, 2007). One of the aspects that can be used while trying to prove negligence is that of going against a statute. In most cases, statues outline how people should act in various situations and the standard of care that is required. If anyone goes against this standards they can be assumed to be negligent and the same used against them. Keiths actions in this case however do not go against any set statute that directly instructs carpenters to replace rotten woods with new ones. Experts on certain areas can also be approached to provide their evidence on whether or not the defendant was negligent while undertaking their duties (Magnus et al., 2004). This testimony can be used in favor or against the defendant depending on its nature. Ruth can req uest the services of experienced carpenters to testify to the court whether Keith was negligent or not on how he handled the repairs yet he claimed to be an expert on the same. Customs is also another factor that can be used in trying to determine whether or not a defendant was negligent or not. If there is a custom whereby certain activities are undertaken in a similar manner it is important to note that the same can be used against or for the benefit of the defendant (Levy et al., 2016). Therefore in this case, it is customary for carpenters to replace rotting wood with new treated wood in order to ensure the safety of the people. Keith failed to undertake this and as a result Ruth was injured. The other element that should be proven in the court in the case is that of the defendant owing the plaintiff the duty of care (Stewart Stuhmcke, 2009). It is essential to understand that according to the natural laws of justice while people are undertaking services they should owe the other party the duty of care. In this case Keith owed Ruth the duty of care by ensuring that the repairs he undertook were safe and not endangering her life. However, the same did not happen since Keith did not replace the rotten wood which would thereafter cause injury to Ruth. Ruth can try and present to the court that if it was not for Keiths actions of claiming to be a qualified carpenter the injuries would have not occurred. In Barrett v MOD The duty of care arose whereby the ministry of defence did not take care of the plaintiff husbands leading to excessive drinking (People v. Barrett, 943 N.E.2d 329, 373 Ill. App. 3d 1144 (App. Ct. 2007). The facts of the case were that the plaintiffs husband had been celebrating a recent promotion as well as his birthday whereby he indulged in excessive drinking at the duty free bar. After a couple of drinks he passed out whereby the commanding officer instructed a junior officer to go and take care of him. After some time he realized that the officer was not breathing. The wife sued claiming that the Ministry of Defense had the duty of care to ensure that army officers at the base did not dangerously get drunk. The court ruled that the Ministry of defense was reluctant to enforce the excessive drinking rules thus resulting into the officers death. Due to this action the defendant was accused of contributory negligence and the damages deducted by 25%. It is also essential to point out that the law refrains anybody from undertaking part in activities that endanger the lives of others. This is a duty of care that ensures that people are safe from having their lives endangered and everybody should adhere to the same (Sergienko, 2006). In t his case, Keith failed the duty of care due to the fact that he endangered the life of Ruth by covering the rotten timber yet he very well knew that the same was a threat to her. The court should therefore take into consideration this fact in order to ensure that Ruth the required justice. The plaintiff must also present to the court that the defendant failed to act in a reasonable way. It is important to understand that if the defendant failed to act in a reasonable manner (Giliker Beckwith, 2009). Keith had the duty to understand that it would only be reasonable to replace the rotten wood with a new one. Therefore, in this case, it would be deemed that a reasonable person would be able to understand that the failure to replace the rotten wood would result to injury to a person who would walk on it. In his case Keith failed to act as a reasonable person resulting to the accident. There are a number of factors that are considered when trying to determine what who a reasonable person is depending on different situations. One of the factors that are considered when trying to prove the element of reasonable person in contributory negligence is that of special skills. When an action is undertaken it is important to understand whether the person undertaking the same needed any special skills yet the plaintiff did not consider the same at the first place (Schwartz Rowe, 2010). In this case, we can see that Keith claimed to be a skilled carpenter and won Ruths heart and got the job. Therefore, it is important to understand that Ruth expected the job undertaken to be within the standards that any professional carpenter can undertake. The other aspect that is considered when trying to figure out who is a reasonable person is that of age. One cannot sue children with contributory negligence due to their actions (Zirkel Clark, 2007). According to the law, children are not regarded as reasonable people. Keith in this case was not a child and therefore the aspect of a reasonable person cannot be ruled out. It is also important to ensure that the mental capacity of the person being sued is assessed in order to get a better understanding of the person. People with mental disorders cannot be sued for their actions and it is very important to understand that a mental capacity test should be undertaken on Keith. This is because he lied on an advert that he was a qualified carpenter prompting Ruth to award her the job yet he was not qualified to undertake such a job. Apart from the mental capacities the other factor that is highly considered while trying to determine a reasonable person is that of physical characteristics (Schwartz Rowe, 2010). It is important to understand that people with some physical deformities may not be able to undertake some tasks and it is up to the plaintiff to consider this while awarding someone a job in order to prevent future disputed. For example, Ruth should not have expected that Keith would be able to complete the work if he was blind. However, in this case there is no mental incapability that has been noted and it is expected that Keith should have presented his work to the required standards. It is also essential to understand that the court also needs to understand that the defendant was aware that there actions would result in to injury. As a carpenter Keith should have been able to ensure that the work delivered is of the highest standards possible. Therefore in this case, it is deemed appropriate to state that Keith understood the consequences of the poor work that he delivered to his client and this case should be able to face the consequences. The other element that Ruth must be able to satisfy the court with is the fact that she actually experienced injury as a result of the negligence of the plaintiff (Little, 2007). In this case, we can see that Ruth suffered a number of injuries and financial damage as a result of the injuries incurred. In this case, the defendant must be able to partially refund Ruth for some of the damages incurred in order to enable get herself to the initial places that she was at. In conclusion, it is essential to understand that one can sue a party for contributory negligence in order to be awarded damages. In this case, Ruth suffered injuries that were partly caused by her lack to take note of the unskilled work as well as the poor work that Keith had undertaken. As noted Keith had purported to be a skilled carpenter in an advert yet he was not and as a reason of this he delivered substandard work. However in order to prove contributory negligence, Ruth must be able to prove a number of contributory negligence elements. One of the elements that must be proven is that proof of negligence (McMillan, 2005). There is need to showcase the court that there was actual negligence that happened due to an act or omission of the defendant. There is also the need to ensure that there was damage that resulted as a cause of the defendants actions. Ruth can present to the court evidence of the injuries she suffered and job loss in order to pray for damages. In this case, i t is important to understand in contributory negligence that it is also important for the defendant to present to the court that their actions also were part of the cause of the damage incurred. References Robinette, C.J. and Sherland, P.G., 2003. Contributory or Comparative: Which Is the Optimal Negligence Rule.N. Ill. UL Rev.,24, p.41.herland, 2003) Rowe, E.A., 2009. Contributory negligence, technology, and trade secrets. Magnus, U., Martn-Casals, M. and van Boom, W.H., 2004.Unification of tort law: contributory negligence(Vol. 8). Kluwer Law International. Levy, N.M., Golden, M.M. and Sacks, L., 2016.Comparative Negligence, Assumption of the Risk, and Related Defenses(Vol. 1). California Torts. Stewart, P.E. and Stuhmcke, A.G., 2009.Australian principles of tort law. The Federation Press. Giliker, P. and Beckwith, S., 2000.Tort. Sweet and Maxwell. Zirkel, P.A. and Clark, J.H., 2007. School negligence case law trends.S. Ill. ULJ,32, p.345. Schwartz, V.E. and Rowe, E.F., 2010.Comparative negligence. LexisNexis. Little, W.B., 2007. It Is Much Easier to Find Fault with Others, Than to be Faultless Ourselves: Contributory Negligence as a Bar to Claim for Breach of the Implied Warranty of Merchantability.Campbell L. Rev.,30, p.81. McMillan, J. (2005). Contributory Negligence and Statutory Damage Limits-An Old Alternative to a Contemporary Movement.Idaho L. Rev.,42, 269. McDonald, B., 2007. The Impact of the Civil Liability Legislation on Fundamental Policies and Principles of the Common Law of Negligence. Sergienko, G.S., 2006. Assumption of Risk as a Defense to Negligence.W. St. UL Rev.,34, p.1. DANGEESOCCUPIER'S, T.N.I.U., Students may also like to refer to Yachuk v. Oliver Blais Co., Ltd.[1949] AC 386a Privy Council case of a like nature. JGF. People v. Barrett, 943 N.E.2d 329, 373 Ill. App. 3d 1144 (App. Ct. 2007).